A number of readers have written to The Occasions to precise their concern with our use of the phrase “catch and launch” in our latest protection of the Trump administration’s efforts to crack down on unlawful immigration.
“ ‘Catch and launch’ is a sport fishing time period for the follow of catching fish and releasing them, alive, again into the water,” Tim Pierce from Berlin, Mass., wrote in a letter to the editor on Wednesday. “The Trump administration makes use of it as a part of a method to dehumanize immigrants. The Occasions should not be complicit on this technique of dehumanization, and should reject this biased time period.”
We requested our deputy nationwide editor Kim Murphy to reply.
The phrase “catch and launch” has been used off-and-on to explain immigration coverage since not less than the administration of George W. Bush.
President Trump has made it a favourite time period for what he considers the federal government’s lack of vigilance in detaining migrants who cross the border illegally. For too lengthy, he argues, the federal government has allowed migrants in such circumstances to be launched from detention and easily present up for his or her immigration hearings with a view to stay, probably for years, in the USA. Such a coverage, he believes, encourages extra migrant households to embark on harmful journeys, persuaded by precedent that freedom waits on the different finish.
Mr. Trump is a grasp of catchphrases; he makes use of them so typically that information organizations may be tempted to undertake them, typically tongue-in-cheek, as shorthand for presidency coverage. “Drain the swamp” (trim government bureaucracy). “Big, beautiful wall” (fortify the border). “Worst trade deal ever” (Nafta). “Greatest theft in the history of the world” (China). “Rocket man” (North Korea). “Fake news” (fill within the clean).
“Catch and launch” has had a method of seeping into information protection as a result of it so succinctly describes a fancy set of responses to unlawful immigration and asylum regulation. I personally would by no means have considered it as a method of equating human beings to fish. But in fact by adopting a fishing metaphor, it does exactly that.
Right here on the Nationwide desk, we’ve requested all our immigration writers to consider carefully earlier than utilizing this phrase, ensuring they embody it solely in reference to the administration’s use of the phrase; we don’t need to make it ours.
Please share your ideas within the feedback.
A notice to readers who will not be subscribers: This text from the Reader Center does not count toward your monthly free article limit.
Follow the @ReaderCenter on Twitter for extra protection highlighting your views and experiences and for perception into how we work.