California Is Expected to Pull National Guard Troops Out of Border Duty – News


LOS ANGELES — Gov. Gavin Newsom of California is predicted on Monday to withdraw almost 400 of his state’s Nationwide Guard troops from deployment alongside the border with Mexico and assign them to different duties, in keeping with aides to the governor.

The step to rescind state authorization for the border deployment is a pointy rebuke of President Trump’s continued warnings that undocumented migrants current a nationwide safety danger to the US. It follows an analogous transfer final week by Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico.

Beneath a “normal order” that Mr. Newsom plans to signal on Monday, 110 California Nationwide Guard troops might be redirected to help the state’s central hearth company, Cal Hearth, and one other 100 will work on statewide “intelligence operations” geared toward worldwide legal drug gangs.

Mr. Newsom can be looking for to broaden the state’s Counterdrug Process Pressure with 150 Nationwide Guard troops, which might require funding from the Division of Protection.

[This month, we’re launching a limited-run weekly e-newsletter about life on the border, removed from the tug-of-war of Washington politics. Sign up here to receive the first issue of Crossing the Border when it launches.]

Since his election in November, Mr. Newsom has emphasized a progressive vision for California and the country, pitching his state as a leader on issues like immigration, climate change and income inequality. He promised last month to “offer an alternative to the corruption and incompetence in the White House.”

READ  Top: Pensioner wins $1m a day after his wife beats cancer

Mr. Newsom is expected to speak publicly about the redeployment during his State of the State address on Tuesday, with sharp criticism of the president’s immigration policies and rhetoric.

The National Guard has had an expanded presence in California since April, when Mr. Newsom’s predecessor, Jerry Brown, agreed to add 400 troops to shore up border-related security at the request of the Trump administration.

At the time, Mr. Brown stressed that the deployment, which was financed by the federal government, would support efforts to go after criminal gangs, human traffickers and drug smugglers. He said the troops would not be used to enforce federal immigration policies.

“This will not be a mission to build a new wall,” Mr. Brown wrote in a letter to Kirstjen Nielsen, the secretary of homeland security, and Jim Mattis, who was secretary of defense at the time.

“It will not be a mission to round up women and children or detain people escaping violence and seeking a better life,” Mr. Brown wrote, adding, “There is no massive wave of migrants pouring into California. Overall immigrant apprehensions on the border last year were as low as they’ve been in nearly 50 years.”

READ  Top - Ace Combat 7: Can it match flying in real-life?

Mr. Newsom and Mr. Brown are both Democrats. So is Governor Grisham of New Mexico, though the predecessor whose deployment decision she reversed was a Republican.

Before the April deployment, there were about 250 National Guard troops serving in California, and 55 of them were stationed at the border. Under federal law, the troops are paid by the federal government but are under the control of the governor. It was not clear whether federal financing for the troops would continue after Mr. Newsom’s redirection order.

Mr. Brown’s letter authorizing the deployment was largely seen at the time as a denunciation of President Trump’s immigration policies, but many activists and elected officials in the state sharply criticized Mr. Brown for agreeing to any guard deployment at all.

Last summer, Kevin De León, who was then the State Senate leader, urged Mr. Brown to “not be complicit” in the administration’s hard-line immigration priorities, which he called “driven by racial animus.” Mr. De Leon, a Democrat, drafted the state law limiting coordination between local authorities and immigration enforcement agents, known colloquially as the “sanctuary state” law, which Mr. Brown signed in 2017.

READ  Hearts keeper Zdenek Zlamal tells Hibs fan: 'You punched me within the face'

Despite the criticism, Mr. Brown later extended state authorization for the National Guard presence at the border through March 2019.

Mr. Trump initially thanked Mr. Brown for the deployment, which was part of a national deployment of up to 4,000 troops authorized by Mr. Mattis. But to the confusion of many Californians, Mr. Trump later blasted the governor for placing limits on what the troops could do.

“Looks like Jerry Brown and California are not looking for safety and security along their very porous Border,” Mr. Trump wrote on Twitter. “He can’t come to phrases for the Nationwide Guard to patrol and shield the Border. The excessive crime price will solely get greater.”

Unlawful border crossings have been sharply declining for years. Apprehensions of undocumented migrants by border patrol brokers are close to historic lows. And undetected crossings have fallen to 62,000 in 2016 from 851,000 in 2006, in keeping with the Division of Homeland Safety. A number of research point out that crime charges are decrease amongst immigrants than amongst native-born Individuals.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here