A landmark trial of company duty has ended, with telecoms operator Orange – previously France Télécom – accused of “ethical harassment” resulting in a wave of suicides within the 2000s.
The prosecution has requested for the utmost sentences: a positive of €75,000 (£67,000) for France Télécom and a 12 months’s imprisonment for 3 prime former executives. The decision is predicted on 20 December.
It has been a protracted and arduous two-and-a-half months, emotionally taxing each for the accused and for many who got here to provide proof towards them.
The court docket heard heart-rending testimony from households of those that died.
In all, the circumstances of 19 suicides had been included by the prosecution, together with 20 others who declare to have suffered as victims of managerial abuse.
The administration plan was to chop about 22,000 jobs out of France Télécom’s 130,000 whole, to make sure the agency’s survival.
‘France Télécom is accountable for my suicide’
Every story needed to be advised intimately – like that of Rémy Louvradoux, a 56-year-old France Télécom employee, who died by setting hearth to himself exterior his workplace in April 2011.
His daughter, Noémie, stated he grew to become “the char stain on the wall” on the France Télécom constructing within the south-western city of Mérignac.
“My father’s dying meant [management’s] goal had been achieved.”
Or of Michel Deparis, who killed himself in 2009, leaving a letter through which he stated: “What led to that is my job. France Télécom is accountable for my suicide.”
The court docket heard from psychologists and sociologists, and specialists in struggling within the office.
And it heard from the senior managers who allegedly masterminded the coverage of “ethical harassment”, cynically designed, stated the prosecution, to get individuals who could not be pushed out of the corporate to leap of their very own accord.
Three prime managers who may face jail
- Former chief government Didier Lombard
- Former deputy chief government Louis-Pierre Wenes
- Former head of human sources Olivier Barberot
4 different executives had been additionally within the dock.
- French firm faces trial over suicides
- France Telecom man burns to dying
Job cuts ‘by the window or the door’
The trial heard of two tasks – in traditional management-speak known as NExT and ACT – which had been drawn up in 2006.
The primary was a plan to restructure France Télécom because it tailored to competitors within the non-public sector. NExT referred in English to “New Expertise in Telecom companies”.
The second was the social “accompaniment” for 22,000 job cuts. ACT stood in French for “anticipation and expertise for transformation”.
The court docket heard of an notorious speech to senior managers in Paris, when France Télécom’s then chief government Didier Lombard – now within the dock – stated: “We should be fairly clear that we can not defend everybody. In 2007 I’ll have these job cuts a technique or one other. By the window or by the door.”
The judges know they are going to be rendering a verdict which may have monumental implications for the long run conduct of main companies.
An unprecedented case
Again within the mid-2000s, France Télécom was within the throes of a monumental financial and cultural change.
Privatised by the federal government, it was having to adapt to the novelty of competitors in addition to a dizzying tempo of technological change.
Workers who had been employed within the 1980s and 1990s, anticipating a protracted profession doing a traditional job in a state monopoly, discovered themselves struggling in a brand new world of name centres and value management.
Complicating the scenario additional was that the majority of those employees had been taken on as state workers, so their jobs had been protected.
They could not be made to go away, so administration determined they needed to be inspired. And in the long run France Télécom grew to become Orange and survived and thrived.
That’s the context for this unprecedented trial, the primary ever of an organization for “ethical harassment”.
The prosecution says the highest executives intentionally created situations which they knew would push some workers over the sting.
The defence says it’s the form of cost that’s not possible to show.
Every case is definitely a human drama – and no-one in court docket has for one prompt claimed the struggling of France Télécom employees was not real.
However establishing a sequence of duty from suicide sufferer to senior supervisor – that may be a serious step in jurisprudence.